Me and Rush Limbaugh’s big mouth!


It’s not a fluke, I suppose, my friends.  And it’s not your fault.  I leaked some kingdom knowledge in my February 12th post, and I forgot to remind you to keep it confidential.  And one of you must have blabbed.  It looked bad, and I’ve laid low this past week trying to salvage my self-inflicted bad fluck–I mean luck.

My faithful readers will understand.

Just weeks ago I was beaming with pride as the American liberals insisted on putting their hands on (and in) women’s bodies by dictating through their dictator that all forms of birth control must now be dictated as part of the welfare dole for all women.

Imagine my delight in the twisted logic of liberals:  Liberal women love to chant “Keep your hands off my body” when they want the government-sanctioned right to kill the products of conception.  But they chant “Put your hands on my body” when they want the government-sanctioned right to free contraception.

Go figure.

Liberal women see no inconsistency in demanding control of other people’s money because they have no control over their own money, much less their own bodies.

I was ahead of the spin curve on this, my friends, and it almost cost me dearly.

Recall that I previously dealt with the controversy of the Obama administration’s demand that all employers, including those having a Biblically informed religious conscience, pay for all forms of contraception of its employees.

At the time I was revelling in my great success in confounding the Americans with mediaswirlification around “women’s rights” and “religious liberties.”

But what everyone was missing was my main goal in this, which went to the heart of freedom!  Yes, everyone seemed to be missing the fact that a modern dictator was dictating to private entities what they must provide free to others.

The dictator was dictating that other people must, based on His Dictateness alone, pay for the sex needs of all women everywhere, including one Ms. Sandra Fluke, a 30-year-old privileged law student going to one of the most expensive law schools in the country.

In a fit of pride, I gloated a rhetorical question: “Where are the sane Americans?”


And then I asked this fateful question:

Where is someone to stand up and tell Ms. Keely and Ms. Sandra to stop begging for someone else’s money and control their own friggin’ bodies or go pay for their own damn birth control?

Well, that’s when my luck turned, and out of nowhere surfaced One Sane American.

My fit of pride became fit to be tied as I listened daily for the next week or so as One Rush Limbaugh, a seemingly singular voice of sanity, picked up on my tactic and drove home the point daily: this issue is bigger than “women” and “religion;” it goes to the heart of FREEDOM.


Did someone leak my kingdom strategy to Mr. Limbaugh?

Of course someone did.

But what was I to do?  Mr. Limbaugh has an audience of millions, an engaging (sometimes enraging) style, and a way of putting the complex into simple terms that anyone but liberals can understand.

He is Conservative One, and he nailed this one: on what basis should taxpayers or insurers (i.e., other people) be required to pay for women’s recreational (and apparently uncontrollable) sex needs?

I recall one of Mr. Limbaugh’s more lucid analogies.  He imagined a neighbor knocking at his door and telling him that she didn’t have any money for birth control.  And then, after getting a “so what?” look from him, he imagined her telling him that she wanted him to pay for her birth control.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

But that is exactly what Ms. Fluke is doing.


Ms. Fluke is knocking on every American’s door and demanding that they pay her so she can go get contraception to have all the sex she wants with guys who are apparently getting all the free sex they want.

And I was truly worried that Mr. Limbaugh’s golden microphone might blow my stratetacticification.

And then. . .

Oh, am I one lucky devil.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Mr. Limbaugh, in trying to illustrate absurdity said what many were thinking–paying for Ms. Fluke’s lack of self-control and sex life?  What does that make her??

What do you call women who have no self-control in the area of sex, and take other people’s money for it?

But, of course, the days when loose women were shamed are long gone.

Now, Ms. Fluke’s parents are supposed to be proud of her.

Hey, I know I am.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

And Mr. Limbaugh?

Well, he flew a little too close to the flame.

Conservative One, meet Liberal One.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

(Oh, but he’ll be back.)



12 Responses to “Me and Rush Limbaugh’s big mouth!”

  1. stratetacticification? holy cow Batman!

  2. Mike N. Says:

    Rush told the truth and then apologized for it. Twice. He may be going for a third apology as his advertisers bail.
    I’m sorry Rush but you are only hurting yourself and our side. Apologizing to this spoiled strumpet who has willingly made herself a tool of the vile Nancy Pelosi and Marxist/Democrat minions everywhere is akin to

    “…saying to the wicked, ‘You are righteous’…
    peoples will curse him, nations will abhor him'”.
    Proverbs 24:24

    With your apology, you have basically reversed yourself and when the knock came at your door you wrote the mooching, Obama-shilling whore a nice fat check. Signed with love and affection. Cal Thomas has suggested that your backtrack was not only commendable but that you should sit down with Ms. Fluke and buy her lunch to show her how sorry you are for telling the truth. “Maybe she’ll become a conservative”, he opines.
    “Slut” and “whore” are ugly words that God is not shy about using in His word. Maybe you are not a fan or reader of that word Rush. Cal Thomas supposedly is. Anyway, when we are cautioned by Jesus about “casting the first stone” we are to understand God’s mercy in light of our own sinfulness. He is not calling for us to endorse fornication like this debauchee has done. Jesus told the adulterous woman to “go and sin no more” as she was obviously penitent. If she had stood up, flipped off Jesus and the crowd, and demanded her right to screw whoever and whenever she wanted at their expense…there would have been a proper and timely reaction.
    The proper reaction to this arrogant and ridiculous woman and her demands of taxpayer-funded fornication is to at least sling some much-deserved mud if not stones. Reasonable people, even the rare honest liberal, must surely have the dry heaves just thinking about this whole scenario. The thought of Rush Limbaugh apologizing twice for telling the truth has me running to the toilet.

    • What on earth was accomplished by Rush’s apology? Absolutely nothing, in my view. Let those advertisers bail. Hundreds more will be willing to fill the void.

  3. I agree with Mike. It was just so disappointing to hear the news that Limbaugh had apologized.

  4. I agree with Mike, also. Ms. Fluke prostituted herself in front of God and America and demanded payment for promiscuity, and our President calls her and applauds her. Mr. Limbaugh had nothing to apologize for. If anyone should be apologizing, it is Sandra Fluke and Barack Obama.

  5. Political Blog…

    […]Me and Rush Limbaugh’s big mouth! « Satan's Blog[…]…

  6. […] From Me and Rush Limbaugh’s big mouth! The dictator was dictating that other people must, based on His Dictateness alone, pay for the sex needs of all women everywhere, including one Ms. Sandra Fluke, a 30-year-old privileged law student going to one of the most expensive law schools in the country. […]

  7. I’m just a casual passerby, so maybe I’ve missed something by not carefully reading all that was written above nor all upon which it is based. However, when is it okay to savage another as Limbaugh savaged this woman? If it is ever okay, then it also could be argued, that chopping off hands, flogging, burning at the stake, using iron maidens, crashing planes into buildings, etc., etc., are equally viable and acceptable ways to make or prosyletize our righteous, God-fearing, holy and self-proclaimed divinely-inspired/informed points of view….

    Except that even this modestly informed, far-from-Bible-scholar writer remembers HE admonished: “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

    Most of the comments here sadly remind me of a line from the movie, “Angels and Demons”: ‘Be careful. These are men of God’.

  8. Just noticed my spelling and punctuation errors. Please don’t hurt me!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: