It’s a girl! Let’s kill it. (Because we support women’s rights.)
Oh, my servants, you try my . . .my . . . well, my . . . impatience! How can you be so stupid! Please excuse my emotion, but know that those whom I love I discipline as the children of mine that they are. And discipline is needed now, my friends. Now.
I’m referring to the potentially kingdom destroying debate going on in the United States over so-called gendercide.
Did you know my good servants that in the United States of America, the land of the free (abortion clinics) and the home of the brave (little mouths that silently scream in protest), people have taken the very natural step of using “health care” to discriminate against women?
Apparently people in the United States have discovered that they can use legal, safe abortion-providing doctor-like people to select the gender of their new-born blob of tissue. And, since everyone knows that boys are much more valuable than girls, the natural outcome is that girls are being “terminated” so that the good would-be parents could try again to get it right.
Yes, it’s true, and let’s just say that I’m not opposed to that in principle. I hate women as much as anyone, and if I could kill them all before they scream out loud for all to hear, I would.
After all, if I could kill all the women I would end the human race.
And I do my best, my servants, as you know. In many places the world over little fingers and toes that started out on little girls are scraped up, bagged, and trashed with the garbage.
And I’m more than happy to continue my efforts in the land of life (for boys), liberty (for boys) and the pursuit of happiness (for boys).
And I can get away with my will on earth as it is in Hell as long as humans are numbed into believing that the “thing” inside a pregnant woman is a “blob” of tissue to be removed like an annoying corn, a threatening tumor, or a troublesome appendix.
But consider, my friends: are there “boy” and “girl” corns? Do tumors come in “male” and “female”? Do appendices get removed based upon their gender?
Imagine my horror, my servants, when I read in CNN.com today when I read that the following headline: “House debates abortion ban for sex of fetus.”
How, my servants, did we let the debate get to this?
Do we have debates in Congress debating a ban on appendectimies based on the sex of an appendix?
Do you see the problem, my servants?
This debate has no good ending for my kingdom.
Of everything that could be removed from a woman’s body, only another human being can be described as “male” or “female.” So if the debate devolves into the question of banning certain abortions based on gender, it is an explicit admission that the “thing” being “terminated” is a human being.
Listen to the dialog, my servants. Here is a quote from Arizona Republican Rep. Trent Franks, the bill’s main sponsor, on the House floor:
I refuse to believe that we cannot find enough humanity in this body to conclude together that it is wrong to knowingly kill unborn children because they are baby girls instead of baby boys.
Stop referring to fetuses as “unborn children”!!!
It gets worse. Rep. Marsha Blackburn railed on:
It is “hypocrisy to say that one is pro-woman and that it’s OK to end the life of an unborn child just because of its gender. Since when did America subscribe to the idea that males are worth more than females? … It’s sick, it’s discriminatory, it’s sexist and it is blatantly anti-woman and anti-human.
These words must not enter into the debate, my friends.
Fortunately I have powerful servants in the US Congress. One of my favorites, Rep. Barbara Lee, said, the bill’s backers were “exploiting serious issues like racism and sexism (as part of) a backdoor attempt to make abortion illegal.”
You go, Barbara. Make sure that gendercide remains a non-issue so that the debate never gets mired down in the question of human-ness.
But other of my servants are not so smart. For example, in an article fortunately entitled, House rejects bill penalizing doctors for sex-selective abortions, Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.) said,
“We can all agree that women should not choose to terminate a pregnancy based solely on gender, but this bill criminalizes a legal procedure.”
NO! We can’t all agree, you already-born dufessette!
Don’t you see? As soon as you admit that the “blob” has a gender, you are admitting it is human.
Please, stop! How are you, Msss. Bonamici, going to defend the proposition that it’s OK to kill humans indiscriminately, but it’s not OK to kill discriminately?
After all, apparently even Rep. Franks and Blackburn are OK with abortion as long as it is gender-neutral. Apparently it only becomes “wrong” (Franks) or “anti-human” (Blackburn) if gender is considered.
Gender neutral killing is OK.
At least it’s OK with me.
So please, my servants, take Rep. Lee’s advice, and resist getting bogged down into the merits of gender-specific abortions.
There is no good end to such discussions.
For my kingdom, I mean.