Archive for the abortion Category

Aurora, Colorado. Testing my long term plan for America.

Posted in abortion, atheism, christians, evolution, liberals, political correctness, progressives, public schools, secular humanism, secularism, Sexual revolution, toleration, worldview with tags , on July 24, 2012 by devilbloggger

Senseless?

Surely by now, my friends, you have had time to reflect on what, but for God’s (blechhh!) grace to the graceless left (in both senses of the word) in America, would be normal: the killing of innocent big people.  Yes, those twelve (or thirteen, or fourteen) big people were in the wrong place at the wrong time; and, yes, they did not deserve to die; and, yes, their killer acted with the full intention of killing as many as he could.  And yes, my servants, I am ultimately to blame.

Some of you fret–even my Temptress dared to question my judgment on this.  But fear much, my servants, I may not be the smartest being in the universe, but I do have a plan.  At the risk of divulging kingdom secrets, I’ll tell you what it is.

You must promise to keep this confidential.  Look around.  Is anyone we can’t trust in the room?  If so, casually switch back to email or something until they leave.

Gone?

OK.  My faithful readers know that I have particular designs on America.  America was truly the land of the free and the home of the brave for generations.

America was founded on a Biblical ethos that produced the most solid, grounded, morally upright people on the planet.  Even the millions who claimed to not believe in God grew up in a cultural sea of moral right and wrong.  Traditional, cultural institutions of the land continually reinforced inner moral compasses by instilling Biblically grounded values.

Of course, we cannot have that, can we, Temptress and friends?

No.

So what was I to do?

I had to systematically remove the collective conscience of a moral people.  I had to slowly transform a generally moral society into a society that values “toleration” and hates “judgment.”  I had to remove from America what made America great: its underlying sense of a transcendent right and wrong based in a person to whom somehow and in some way everyone was ultimately responsible.

And this is just what I did.

Consider: do you think James Holmes ever prayed in a public school?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Do you think James Holmes ever heard the name of God in public except to be ridiculed or treated as a throw back believed only by the morally weak and naive?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Do you think James Holmes was ever in a Christmas play?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Do you think James Holmes ever heard the name of Jesus Christ in public except to be used as in vain?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Do you think James Holmes was ever taught anything in public school except that he was an accidental product of blind nature?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Do you think James Holmes ever saw a TV show or a movie where the subject of religion and/or God was treated with reverence?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Do you think James Holmes ever saw a court of law uphold God’s law in the area of sexual expression?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Do you get it, my servants?

James Holmes is the natural, predictable product of a post-modern, post-Christian, and post-Constitutional America!

The only wonder (and I do wonder) is why there are not innumerably more James Holmses!

James Holmes kills twelve big people and it’s treated as a tragedyTwelve big people in the wrong place at the wrong time; twelve big people who did not deserve to die; killed by a killer acting with the full intention of killing as many as he could.

Hmmm . . . sounds a lot like abortion when I put it that way.

But in that theater it was only big people.

But twelve is considered a big number because it’s still considered wrong to kill big people.

I’ll fix that soon, my friends.  But let me illustrate my genius.

I use killings like those in Aurora, Colorado to test my system, to check if my plan is working out.

And it is.

In all the hand wringing and soul-searching in the media, did you hear one person suggest that America needs to get back on the right moral track?

Did you hear one person suggest that we, as a society, need to get back to moral basics so that we can grow better men?

Grow better men???

Fundamentally different men, with a proper understanding of God’s moral law?

A generation of men who are taught that they are created equal and live under a God who sees all and holds all men responsible?

A land of men who know right from wrong, with toleration and judgment excercised in proper balance?

Such notions sound foreign, don’t they?

That’s my genius, my friends.  Give me credit.

Instead of considering the true reasons for the James Holmses of the land, the Americans started immediately crying about “gun control.”

My friends, let the Americans focus on gun control.  What they are blind to is that guns are merely a tool in the hands of a man raised to do my will on earth because he knows no better.

What Americans should be focusing on is growing better men.

But that’s impossible without God.

So I win, my friends.

I win.

Don’t I?

Advertisements

It’s a girl! Let’s kill it. (Because we support women’s rights.)

Posted in abortion with tags on May 31, 2012 by devilbloggger

Girls.

Oh, my servants, you try my . . .my . . .  well, my . . . impatience!  How can you be so stupid!  Please excuse my emotion, but know that those whom I love I discipline as the children of mine that they are.  And discipline is needed now, my friends.  Now.

I’m referring to the potentially kingdom destroying debate going on in the United States over so-called gendercide.

Did you know my good servants that in the United States of America, the land of the free (abortion clinics) and the home of the brave (little mouths that silently scream in protest), people have taken the very natural step of using “health care” to discriminate against women?

Apparently people in the United States have discovered that they can use legal, safe abortion-providing doctor-like people to select the gender of their new-born blob of tissue.  And, since everyone knows that boys are much more valuable than girls, the natural outcome is that girls are being “terminated” so that the good would-be parents could try again to get it right.

Yes, it’s true, and let’s just say that I’m not opposed to that in principle.  I hate women as much as anyone, and if I could kill them all before they scream out loud for all to hear, I would.

After all, if I could kill all the women I would end the human race.

And I do my best, my servants, as you know.  In many places the world over little fingers and toes that started out on little girls are scraped up, bagged, and trashed with the garbage.

And I’m more than happy to continue my efforts in the land of life (for boys), liberty (for boys) and the pursuit of happiness (for boys).

And I can get away with my will on earth as it is in Hell as long as humans are numbed into believing that the “thing” inside a pregnant woman is a “blob” of tissue to be removed like an annoying corn, a threatening tumor, or a troublesome appendix.

But consider, my friends: are there “boy” and “girl” corns?  Do tumors come in “male” and “female”?  Do appendices get removed based upon their gender?

You laugh?

You laugh?

Imagine my horror, my servants, when I read in CNN.com today when I read that the following headline:  “House debates abortion ban for sex of fetus.” 

Excuse me?

How, my servants, did we let the debate get to this?

Answer me.

Do we have debates in Congress debating a ban on appendectimies based on the sex of an appendix?

Do you see the problem, my servants?

This debate has no good ending for my kingdom.

Of everything that could be removed from a woman’s body, only another human being can be described as “male” or “female.”  So if the debate devolves into the question of banning certain abortions based on gender, it is an explicit admission that the “thing” being “terminated” is a human being.

Listen to the dialog, my servants.  Here is a quote from Arizona Republican Rep. Trent Franks, the bill’s main sponsor, on the House floor:

I refuse to believe that we cannot find enough humanity in this body to conclude together that it is wrong to knowingly kill unborn children because they are baby girls instead of baby boys.

Ahhhhhhhhh!

Stop!

Stop referring to fetuses as “unborn children”!!!

It gets worse.  Rep. Marsha Blackburn railed on:

It is “hypocrisy to say that one is pro-woman and that it’s OK to end the life of an unborn child just because of its gender. Since when did America subscribe to the idea that males are worth more than females? … It’s sick, it’s discriminatory, it’s sexist and it is blatantly anti-woman and anti-human.

Anti-human?

These words must not enter into the debate, my friends.

Fortunately I have powerful servants in the US Congress.  One of my favorites, Rep. Barbara Lee, said, the bill’s backers were “exploiting serious issues like racism and sexism (as part of) a backdoor attempt to make abortion illegal.”

You go, Barbara.  Make sure that gendercide remains a non-issue so that the debate never gets mired down in the question of human-ness.

But other of my servants are not so smart.  For example, in an article fortunately entitled, House rejects bill penalizing doctors for sex-selective abortions,  Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.) said,

“We can all agree that women should not choose to terminate a pregnancy based solely on gender, but this bill criminalizes a legal procedure.”

NO!  We can’t all agree, you already-born dufessette!

Don’t you see?  As soon as you admit that the “blob” has a gender, you are admitting it is human.

Please, stop!  How are you, Msss. Bonamici, going to defend the proposition that it’s OK to kill humans indiscriminately, but it’s not OK to kill discriminately?

Hmmmm, genius?

After all, apparently even Rep. Franks and Blackburn are OK with abortion as long as it is gender-neutral.  Apparently it only becomes “wrong” (Franks) or “anti-human” (Blackburn) if gender is considered.

Gender neutral killing is OK.

At least it’s OK with me.

So please, my servants, take Rep. Lee’s advice, and resist getting bogged down into the merits of gender-specific abortions.

There is no good end to such discussions.

For my kingdom, I mean.

Gallup causing trouble (again)

Posted in abortion, liberals, Morality, Planned Parenthood, politics, Sexual revolution with tags , on May 24, 2012 by devilbloggger

Gallup.

Bad news on the wires today, my friends.  And I’m blaming the Gallup poll folks.  For my non-American readers, Gallup is a leading polling organization in the United States.  They ask all kinds of people all kinds of nosey questions, including stupid questions (for most Americans) like, “Are you for or against the basic human rights the Founding Fathers enshrined in the Constitution.”

Well, what red-blooded American wouldn’t be for constitutionally protected basic human rights?  The Founding Fathers, by the way, made it clear in the Declaration of Independence that these rights are inalienable because they derive from their creator.

Blechhhh!

Fortunately, no American children are ever exposed to these evil documents.  (How many Americans even know what inalienable means?)

And even more fortunately for my kingdom, my servants, is that those amazing Founding Fathers were primarily concerned with the rights of Mounding Mothers.

You did not know that?

Yes, in addition to ensuring future Americans would have rights to free speech, free exercise of religion, and the right to bear arms . . . wait, I thought these rights were inalienable!

Ha ha ha ha ha.

(Sorry, my friends.  But those Americans let their rights be taken from them with hardly a whimper.)

But back to my point–for some reason the Americans willingly let government quietly strip their rights to speech, religion and guns, rights for which many revolutionaries gave their lives.  But fortunately, there is one right enshrined in the US Constitution that will likely never be taken away.

In fact, thousands still die for this right each year.

Yes, it’s the constitutionally protected right of Mounding Mothers to end their mounding together with their motherhood.  And with each end to motherhood a little mound-causing person dies.

An innocent person, at that.

Sometime before their little mound is even detectable.

My kingdom come, my will be done on earth as it is in Hell.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

So, you ask, what does Gallup have to do with this?

Well, the Gallup meddlers are stirring up a non-controversy by asking people if they identify themselves as “pro-choice” or not.

Think about it, my friends, why is the question even being asked?

Really, why?

Does Gallup go around asking people if they consider themselves “pro-free speech”?

You see, my friends, the beauty of constitutionally protected rights that derive from God is that it doesn’t matter if you like them or not — they are guaranteed rights to all (already born) human beings.

And the right for a mother to end her motherhood was, thanks to the amazing foresight of the Founding Fathers, enshrined in the United States Constitution.

So why does Gallup keep asking people if they are for it or against it?

But it’s even worse, my servants.

It seems that in asking the question the Gallup troublemakers found a devastating result.  According to today’s Politico.com,

The percentage of Americans who identify themselves as “pro-choice” is at the  lowest point ever measured by Gallup, according to a new survey released Wednesday.

Yes, a record low 41 percent of Americans now identify themselves as “pro-choice” (which is a euphemism for “anti-Mounding Mothers”).  And worser yet, 50 percent of Americans now consider themselves “pro-life”!

Blechhh!  Blechhhh!

Yes, it’s bad, my servants, and I put much of the blame on Gallup.

By continually asking whether people are “pro-choice” or “pro-life” (Gallup has been asking this question since 1995), they keep alive the notion that maybe, just maybe, abortion is not so inalienable after all (there’s that word again; look it up!)

Does Gallup go around asking people if they are “pro-constitutional rights” or not?

Then why ask the same question differently by substituting “pro-choice” for “pro-constitutional rights?”  The terms are synonymous, right?

By asking the question Gallup reminds everyone that, in fact, the right that thousands die for each year might actually not be so constitutional.

In fact, those thousands might actually die for something that is not only not consitutional, but might just be wrong.

And when people no longer have the cover of “well, it’s legal, so it must be right,” they will have to face what they already sense in their hearts: that abortion is wrong.

Plain wrong.

Gallup, please stop.

Burritos, Abortions, and Woolywolves

Posted in abortion with tags , on April 17, 2012 by devilbloggger

Burritos.

My friends, I must say that sometimes my servants who mean well threaten to set back my agenda by years, if not decades.  I know, I know.  You think you are clever.  You think you are even funny.  But if you had any idea how your cleverness actually works against my kingdom, you would stop.  Please, for the sake of my kingdom, please stop.

What am I referring to?

I’ll tell you.

Sarah Silverman.

Do you know who she is?

No?

Well, I’ll tell you that also.

Sarah Silverman is a comedian.  Do you know how I know?  Because I read about her in a Reuters news article entitled, “Sarah Silverman tweets about burrito ‘abortion’“.  And from the title you can see why this got my attention, although you may not understand why I’m upset about it.  I’ll tell you that in a moment.

But first, let’s discuss Ms. Silverman.  As the Reuters story states, Ms. Silverman is known for “causally shocking humor.”  In fact, I like Ms. Silverman.  She is crude, offensive, bitter toward God, and generally somewhat of a snarky jerk.  Much like me, of course.   I suppose that if I were a female human being of limited intelligence and ability on earth, I would be like Sarah Silverman.

But her burrito stunt went too far, and I must call her out on it.  You see, Ms. Silverman is one of those women who love abortion but are secretly glad her mother did not.  To advance the cause of the un-aborted abortion lovers, she decided to post photos on Twitter, which according to the Reuters story:

Silverman posted two photos on Twitter last week. The first, making fun of sappy pregnancy photos, featured her with a round stomach soon after eating. “It’s a burrito!” she wrote.

 The second photo showed her with her typically flat stomach. Silverman also made an abortion joke that some people found too flippant: “Got a quickie aborsh in case R v W gets overturned,” she wrote, referencing Roe v. Wade.

Get it?

She was making a funny.  She thought it was funny.  Many people thought it was funny.

I did not think it was funny.

Here’s why.

Consider:  would Sarah Silverman, or any of un-aborted women of her ilk have thought it was clever if Silverman had said “Got a quickie appendectomy,” or “Got a quickie tummy tuck,” or Got a quickie enema”?

Well, maybe for women like Silverman the last one might have garnered a smile.

But the answer is “no,” no one would have thought it was funny, interesting, or in any way worth reading.

Why is that?

Why is it that having an abortion is  in any way different from having, say, an appendix removed?

Do you see my point?

Yes, that’s right!  By making a joke as she did, Ms. Silverman only succeeded in reminding everyone, even those who wish to forget, that there is something different about abortion.

Yes, there is something different about abortion, but my lie on earth for decades is that abortion is nothing more than an elective medical procedure that women can choose, just as they might choose to have a pesky, annoying corn removed.

Ms. Silverman simply brings to everyone’s awareness that abortion is different.  And ultimately, Ms. Silverman amplifies the still, small voice in almost everyone’s conscience that abortion is wrong.

Ms. Silverman, please stop.

Now.

I would be in a worse mood if I had not read at National Right to Life News Today an article about a delightful bunch of my servants who go by the label “clergy”!

I thought it was a joke, but soon found that my kingdom was not lost despite the likes of my ignorant but fervent servants like Sarah Silverman.

The title made me smile: “Pro-Abortion Clergy Team up with California PPFA affiliate to offer “40 Days of Prayer to Keep Abortion Safe and Legal.”

Ha ha ha ha ha.

PPFA is Planned Parenthood, my well oiled, well-funded, politically protected baby killing machine!

Hey, when I smile, guess who is grieved?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Yes, it seems a merry little band of wolves in sheep clothing calling themselves “Humboldt County Clergy for Choice,” is teaming up with Six Rivers Planned Parenthood in California for “40 days of Prayer to Keep Abortion Safe and Legal.”

Do I need to point out that all these energetic little kingdom builders are already-born people?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

They refer to themselves as “Faith Aloud,” which I’m assuming implies that faith belongs only to those who can do anything “aloud,” like scream, cry, or beg for mercy.

But the best part is that my wonderfully willing wooly wolves developed a “prayer” for each of the 40 days.  You can read all of them here at an (Un-)Planned (Un-)Parenthood website.  (Did you ever think there would be “prayers” posted at a UU website?)

These “prayers” are real gems of my kingdom.  I think I will print them out to read out loud.  That way at least one supernatural being will hear them.

I’ll just display a few of the better ones below.  I’ve taken the liberty of printing in bold text portions of the prayers that my servants, perfectly imperfect as they are, left out.

Day 2: Today we pray for compassionate religious voices unlike Jesus, the apostles, or prophets of the Bible to speak out for the dignity and autonomy of already-born women to kill their unwanted unborn.

Day 7: Today we pray for the 45 million American women who have had safe, legal abortions which resulted, by definition in at least 90 million fingers and toes safely and legally tossed into the trash.  May they (the already born) stand tall and refuse shame, at least until they stand before their and their baby’s creator.

Day 14 Today we pray for Christians everywhere (except us, who call ourselves Christian) to embrace the loving model of Jesus in the way he refused to shame women, but still required that they “sin no more” which cannot, of course, be reconciled with killing an innocent.

Day 27:  Today we give thanks for abortion providers around the nation whose concern for already born and paying women is the driving force in their lives.

Day 29:  Today we pray that all already born women will know that they are created in the image of God, good and holy, moral and wise, no matter how they decide to purposefully and openly sin by killing another being created in the image of God.

Day 35: Today we pray for unaborted girls everywhere, that they may have every opportunity for education, sport, health, art, and vocation, and the right to kill their little girls if they so choose.

You get the idea, my friends.  I’m amazed at how successful I’ve been at making some people fervently religious against God.

Here’s what I would like you to do.  These prayers of my woolywolf servants are so pitifully misguided that God will certainly not hear them.  So why not shoot the Humboldt County Wooly Wolves for (My) Choice a quick email note to let them know that at least you read them, at info@faithaloud.org.

And, why not go here to read their “prayers” yourself, and use the comment section below to write your own corrected versions of their prayers?

Have fun!

Me and Rush Limbaugh’s big mouth!

Posted in abortion, freedom, Government, marriage, Obama, political correctness, politics, Sexual revolution, Truth with tags , , , on March 6, 2012 by devilbloggger

Fluke.

It’s not a fluke, I suppose, my friends.  And it’s not your fault.  I leaked some kingdom knowledge in my February 12th post, and I forgot to remind you to keep it confidential.  And one of you must have blabbed.  It looked bad, and I’ve laid low this past week trying to salvage my self-inflicted bad fluck–I mean luck.

My faithful readers will understand.

Just weeks ago I was beaming with pride as the American liberals insisted on putting their hands on (and in) women’s bodies by dictating through their dictator that all forms of birth control must now be dictated as part of the welfare dole for all women.

Imagine my delight in the twisted logic of liberals:  Liberal women love to chant “Keep your hands off my body” when they want the government-sanctioned right to kill the products of conception.  But they chant “Put your hands on my body” when they want the government-sanctioned right to free contraception.

Go figure.

Liberal women see no inconsistency in demanding control of other people’s money because they have no control over their own money, much less their own bodies.

I was ahead of the spin curve on this, my friends, and it almost cost me dearly.

Recall that I previously dealt with the controversy of the Obama administration’s demand that all employers, including those having a Biblically informed religious conscience, pay for all forms of contraception of its employees.

At the time I was revelling in my great success in confounding the Americans with mediaswirlification around “women’s rights” and “religious liberties.”

But what everyone was missing was my main goal in this, which went to the heart of freedom!  Yes, everyone seemed to be missing the fact that a modern dictator was dictating to private entities what they must provide free to others.

The dictator was dictating that other people must, based on His Dictateness alone, pay for the sex needs of all women everywhere, including one Ms. Sandra Fluke, a 30-year-old privileged law student going to one of the most expensive law schools in the country.

In a fit of pride, I gloated a rhetorical question: “Where are the sane Americans?”

Remember?

And then I asked this fateful question:

Where is someone to stand up and tell Ms. Keely and Ms. Sandra to stop begging for someone else’s money and control their own friggin’ bodies or go pay for their own damn birth control?

Well, that’s when my luck turned, and out of nowhere surfaced One Sane American.

My fit of pride became fit to be tied as I listened daily for the next week or so as One Rush Limbaugh, a seemingly singular voice of sanity, picked up on my tactic and drove home the point daily: this issue is bigger than “women” and “religion;” it goes to the heart of FREEDOM.

Blechhhh!

Did someone leak my kingdom strategy to Mr. Limbaugh?

Of course someone did.

But what was I to do?  Mr. Limbaugh has an audience of millions, an engaging (sometimes enraging) style, and a way of putting the complex into simple terms that anyone but liberals can understand.

He is Conservative One, and he nailed this one: on what basis should taxpayers or insurers (i.e., other people) be required to pay for women’s recreational (and apparently uncontrollable) sex needs?

I recall one of Mr. Limbaugh’s more lucid analogies.  He imagined a neighbor knocking at his door and telling him that she didn’t have any money for birth control.  And then, after getting a “so what?” look from him, he imagined her telling him that she wanted him to pay for her birth control.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

But that is exactly what Ms. Fluke is doing.

Exactly.

Ms. Fluke is knocking on every American’s door and demanding that they pay her so she can go get contraception to have all the sex she wants with guys who are apparently getting all the free sex they want.

And I was truly worried that Mr. Limbaugh’s golden microphone might blow my stratetacticification.

And then. . .

Oh, am I one lucky devil.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Mr. Limbaugh, in trying to illustrate absurdity said what many were thinking–paying for Ms. Fluke’s lack of self-control and sex life?  What does that make her??

What do you call women who have no self-control in the area of sex, and take other people’s money for it?

But, of course, the days when loose women were shamed are long gone.

Now, Ms. Fluke’s parents are supposed to be proud of her.

Hey, I know I am.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

And Mr. Limbaugh?

Well, he flew a little too close to the flame.

Conservative One, meet Liberal One.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

(Oh, but he’ll be back.)

Blechhhh!

Obama: Now I will pay for your sin

Posted in abortion, Bible, Catholic Church, christians, False religion, Government, liberals, liberty, Morality, Obama, politics, progressives, religion, taxes, Truth with tags , , on February 12, 2012 by devilbloggger

Retire.

Oh, I just might be able to retire, my friends.  Yes, retirement really never was on my mind for thousands of years, but this past week’s events in the United States [the last bastion of freedom in the world] has made me re-think my short term plans.  (My long term plans were set long ago, unfortunately.)

You see, my servants, the Obama administration has put my agenda on warp speed in forcing my will on earth as it is in Hell.

But even I had no idea that those Americans would ever reach a place where large numbers would reject a Savior’s payment for past sinful pleasures, and instead demand that a goverment pay for future sinful pleasures.

Payment for sin is exactly what the Obama administration demands in its new policies demanding that all employers, including those having a Biblically informed religious conscience, pay for the sin of its employees.

Imagine: a formerly Christian nation in which God’s remaining people are literally forced to pay for the sins of mine!

Ha ha ha ha ha.

It’s a beautiful thing, my friends.  Can it get any better?

Well, yes, it can.

Let me explain.  I was just beaming this week, my friends, when at the National Prayer Breakfast (the what????) I saw my Self-righteous Servant Obama demand not only that taxes from the righteous should pay for the sin of heathens, but that his policy “as a Christian,” “coincides with Jesus’s teaching that ‘for unto whom much is given, much shall be required.’ ”

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Seriously, now, my friends.  Do you know what I do to deceive people?

Yes, you do.  I misquote scripture, use scripture for nefarious purposes, and generally cause mass confusion and deception by picking and choosing among various scripture passages as proof texts.

Do you know how Obama deceives people?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Obama went on to emulate me by misquoting the “Golden Rule” this way, as reported at monney.cnn.com:

“And I believe in God’s command to love thy neighbor as thyself. I know a version of that golden rule is found in every major religion and every set of beliefs.”

My friends, this is not the Golden Rule.

But who knows?

Apparently very few.  And when few know scripture, anyone can use scripture for ungodly purposes.

You see, unlike Obama, my misquoting of scripture was met with a swift and certain “Get thee behind me, Satan.”

But who will stand up to Obama?

No, really, who?

Obama has mangled the Golden Rule in the past, and you can read over at the Ye Have Heard blog here.  Note Obama’s “subtle” but “significant” mangling of the Golden Rule as “treating others as they would treat me.”  (In reality, there was nothing subtle about it; the fact is Obama is scripture-illiterate and didn’t have a clue what he was saying.)  As noted by a reader:

The most succinct statement of the Golden Rule in the Bible is Luke 6:31: “Do to others as you would have them do to you.”

There is a subtle, but rather significant, difference between saying “[I treat] others the way they would treat me” and “[I treat] others the way I would want them to treat me.”

But no matter; Obama believes that holy scripture is part of his playground for social and political engineering.  And to make matters better, his shameless select-a-scripture has revealed two great advances of my kingdom on earth.

First, I was thrilled by how much of the ensuing noise, smoke, and diatribification was directed at a “woman’s right to health care.”  For example, the always reliable Huffington Post ran a gem entitled “Students at Catholic Colleges Protest Lack of Access to Birth Control.”  The article summarizes an 18-year old student, Keely Monroe’s, life at Fordham University as:

Single, 18-year-old female, likes having control over her own body, looking for affordable birth control.

Yes, this is just an example of the genre of medianoisemachiniszation that framed the argument as “no insurance payment for birth control = robbing women of control,” i.e., taking away women’s control over their bodies.  That is, Ms. Keely believes that the good citizens of the United States should pay for her sinful bodily choices (which she apparently can’t control), and, if they refuse, she accuses them of robbing her of her bodily control.  Another student, Sandra Fluke went as far as to say that women enrolling in Catholic universities merely “expected women to be treated equally, to have their medical needs met.”

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Where are the sane Americans?

Where is someone to stand up and tell Ms. Keely and Ms. Sandra to stop begging for someone else’s money and control their own friggin’ bodies or go pay for their own damn birth control?

But already too many people agree with Ms. Keely and Ms. Sandra (and Mr. Obama) that it is the place of government to offer everything to everyone for free, including payment for sin.

Oh, I smell retirement now.

The second advance in my kingdom’s goals was revealed in a Daily Caller article on this topic, with the enlightening title, Southern  Baptist Convention’s Richard Land: ‘How dumb does [Obama] think we  are?’  Mr. Land’s question came after Obama, showing he really is my servant, offered an “adjustment” to the mandate that righteous people pay for the sins of others by shifting payment obligations from employers to insurance companies.

But the delightful question answers itself.

Obama does believe you are dumb.

And he has good reason.

Because, think about it, my servants, who can stop him?

Really, who can stop him?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Who can stop me?

Retirement, here I come!

Komen and HHS confirm I’m in control in the US (of course)

Posted in abortion with tags , on February 4, 2012 by devilbloggger

Health. Human. Services.  All three are mine, my friends!

Have I had a good week, or what!  Oh, my servants, rarely do I see my agenda on earth so forcefully advanced than I did this last week.  I know many of you think my agenda is complicated, and on many levels it is.  But let me give you a clue as to the status, health, and progress of the single best indicator of the advancement or retreat of my agenda.  You need follow only one issue: abortion.

And I am clearly in full advance mode.

Now, seriously, my friends, this is kingdom knowledge and I trust you will handle it appropriately.  Please don’t go out and tell all those who can’t be trusted.  But know that I have carefully built a culture, an industry, and an army of protectors around the one, definitive and defining right and rite in modern society: the legally sanctioned right of women (and men) to kill unborn women (and men).

Yes, it sounds so yucky when I speak plainly, but I trust you can handle the plain truth.  Abortion, which is the sanitized name for “killing an unborn human being by an already-born human being at the already-born human being’s sole discretion” is the sacred rite of every religion of mine, which makes it the legal right of every government-protected religion and belief system on earth.

Separation of church and state?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

It’s only separation of Christianity and state, my friends.

The remainder of all godless and Godless religions (which can be full of self-described Christians, like President Obama) find their practices not only endorsed by the state, but required by the state.

I was blessed with a shining example of the cozying-up of godless church and state this week with the announcement by the US Obama administration’s Department of Health and (Already Born) Human Services’ decision requiring church-affiliated employers to cover birth control, as reported by the AP with the misleading title of, “Contraception mandate outrages religious groups“.

Misleading?

Yes, misleading.

Don’t you see?

Oh, my servants.  Sometimes you try my patience, of which I was imbued with very little.

The title should have read, “Contraception mandate delights most religious people, but outrages those whose religion includes a true and right belief in God as disclosed in the Bible.”

Or, alternatively, “Contraception mandate outrages God.”

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Oh, I like governments who sadden God.  But I love those who outrage God.

Because I, like most religionists on earth, including the secular religionists running most Western governments, hate God.

Yes, I know.

Yes, yes, I know, they will deny they hate God.

But it’s not what they say, it’s what they do.

Imagine, my servants, the great delight I have in watching a government bully and crush people of conscience in a mandate over “birth control.”  Because “birth control” is, in the minds of the conscience-crushers, only an aborted baby step away from the ultimate birth “control” available.

Abortion is the goal, here, my friends.  Make no mistake.

And it is on the topic of abortion that I experienced my second great show of control in the US this week.  Many of you know that the Susan G. Komen foundation earlier this week made an executive decision to withdraw its funding to Unplanned Unparenthood (actual name; remember, look at what they do, not what they say.)  It seems that the Komen foundation has a rule against funding organizations that are under investigation (by the government, not by God), and withdrew funds because Unplanned Unparenthood, is, in fact, under investigation (by the government and by God).

You see, Unplanned Unparenthood, described as a “women’s health provider,” represents the leading denomination of the Church That Hates God on earth.  And the Komen foundation touched on the Church That Hates God’s sacred rite and legal right, a touch of the kind that inevitably sends the theophobic faithful into a religious fervor like the world has rarely seen.

We saw it this week, my friends.

Abortion is not to be touched, even if the touch is to remove a helpful touch.

As reported by Forbes.com, before even one set of 10 fingers or toes could be spared, the religiously weak Komen Foundation caved to the religious fanaticism of my theophobes on earth.  Ironically, those bewailing Komen’s decision could bewail it only because I was unsuccessful in getting their little bewailers cut up before they could take their first breath.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Sometimes I’m lucky even in my failures.

But this week was not one of my failures, but my successes.

You see, The Koward Foundation decided, according to their website, to reinstate funding to kill unborn women with this very, very, delicious statement of my fear-induced lunacy:

We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha.

Apology accepted!

Let’s go “save” some women’s lives.

I’m winning.

Celebrate with me, my servants.  and send the Koward Foundation a note of support by going here and letting them know that their actions are not only good, they are Satan Approved.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Oh, winning is fun.

%d bloggers like this: